In Western countries, hard work and a feeling of self-worth are seen as leading to success and, ultimately, happiness. According to this definition, happiness is somewhat subjective and independent of other factors.
On the other hand, in Asian countries happiness is seen as something more interdependent. It comes out of social connections and relationships with others.
Researchers usually use methods developed in so-called WEIRD — Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic — countries when they try to measure happiness across different cultures.
Outside of the West, people seem to value the happiness of others as well as their own and focus more on the absence of stress.
Their findings suggest that how people define happiness depends a lot on the culture in which they live, so it is important to use distinct measures of happiness to account for these cultural differences.
Almost 15,500 college-age students from 62 countries took a survey that included questions based on independent and interdependent indicators of happiness. They logged on to a dedicated website to answer the survey’s questions.
Students from countries that had slower population growth and colder climates and were more developed had similar scores on the subjective, independent measure of happiness. The subjective scale was more reliable than the interdependent scale at measuring happiness in Western countries such as Belgium, Denmark and the United Kingdom. However, it was not as reliable as the interdependent scale for Eastern countries such as China, Japan and Vietnam. The subjective scale was particularly unreliable at measuring happiness in Middle Eastern and African countries.
The interdependent scale performed more consistently overall than the subjective scale. Unlike scores on the subjective scale, scores on the interdependent scale were unrelated to factors that varied between countries, such as economic development or cultural factors.
“While there is some cross-cultural variation in how we define happiness, we are still far more similar than we are different,” said Gardiner, currently a Humboldt Foundation postdoctoral fellow in Germany.
It will be interesting to see how both measures of happiness perform in different countries during and after the pandemic, Gardiner said. She and her team have already collected data from countries that participated in the current study, so they can compare pre- and post-pandemic results. “Perhaps for some people, particularly in the West, who were forced to stay home, getting out and doing things that make them happy may shift their focus towards more interpersonal social connections as a source of happiness.”
The study is published in PLOS ONE.