Not all aloe vera gel is created equal. More >
Fewer Boys Being Circumcised
Circumcision of newborn male infants, the surgical removal of the foreskin covering the tip of the penis, may be performed for both health and religious reasons. It is an elective, and somewhat controversial, procedure.
The potential health benefits of male circumcision include a decreased risk of urinary tract infections and sexually transmitted diseases, protection again penile cancer and decreased risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners, prevention of inflammation of the glans and foreskin, and prevention of phimosis and paraphimosis, the inability to retract and return the foreskin to its original position. The risks of circumcision include pain, bleeding, infection, inflammation, and penile injury.
Three studies have been published recently which show that circumcision of adult African men reduces their risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. It is not clear that such risk reductions would be the same in more developed nations. This information prompted researchers to assess the current rate of newborn circumcision in the US. Their findings were reported by the Centers for Disease Control in their Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).
Using data from three different sources that looked only at the circumcision rates in hospitals, they determined that between 1999 and 2010, circumcision rates had decreased compared with previous years. In one instance, the incidence decreased from 62.5% in 1999 to 56.9% in 2008. In another it decreased from 63.5% in 1999 to 56.3% in 2008; and in the third it decreased from 58.4% in 2001 to 54.7% in 2010. Since many circumcisions are done as an outpatient procedure or as an out-of-hospital religious ritual, these figures are likely to be underestimates of the actual numbers of circumcised males
The researchers suggest that many factors may contribute to the decreasing circumcision rate seen in all three samples. There is evidence that good hygiene and safe sexual practices can provide some of the same health benefits of circumcision. The American Academy of Pediatrics in their 1999 policy statement noted that although “existing scientific evidence demonstrates potential medical benefits of newborn male circumcision, these data are not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision...” Economics may also play a major role. Medicaid currently covers newborn male circumcision in 33 states. In those states with coverage, the rate was 24% higher than in states without such coverage.
As the AAP statement articulates: “To make an informed choice, parents of all male infants should be given accurate and unbiased information and be provided the opportunity to discuss this decision. It is legitimate for parents to take into account cultural, religious, and ethnic traditions, in addition to medical factors, when making this decision.’
1. Trends in In-Hospital Newborn Male Circumcision – United States, 1999-1010 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. September 2, 2011/60(34);1167-1186
September 19, 2011