August 29, 2014
   
Add to Google
For a Rational Decision, Let Your Subconscious Do the Thinking
email a friend print


Nearly all preschoolers have tantrums sometimes, but perhaps surprisingly, daily tantrums are not typical behavior. More >

Follow us on Twitter. Become a fan on Facebook. Receive updates via E-mail and SMS:







Would you like to ask our staff a question? >
Join the discussion and leave a comment on this article >


For a Rational Decision, Let Your Subconscious Do the Thinking

 
For years, the conventional wisdom among cognition researchers has been that humans rarely make rational decisions. Recent research indicates that people do indeed make rational decisions — but only when they do it subconsciously.

Neuroscientists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky received a Nobel Prize in 2002 for earlier research which indicated that people rarely make rational decisions. Their work dealt with people's conscious assessment of probabilities. How can people who have major difficulties balancing a checkbook possibly be expected to perform accurate probability calculations?

...[H]uman beings make very good probability assessments when they use the subconscious or unconscious part of their brain to make these decisions.

The answer lies in the subconscious.

Alex Pouget is an associate professor of brain and cognitive sciences at Rochester University. He's of the opinion that human beings make very good probability assessments when they use the subconscious or unconscious part of their brain to make these decisions. And he's done research that backs up this hypothesis.

Most decisions people make are made subconsciously. The decision to stop at a red light or to wear clothes to work are two examples of this sort of automatic decision-making. Many of these decisions end up being the correct ones.

Pouget designed an experiment where subjects would watch a series of moving dots on a computer screen. Most of the dots were moving in random directions, but some of them were programmed to move in a specific direction. A subject had to decide if the dots were moving to the left or to the right. Experimenters were able to monitor the activity of particular neurons in a subject's brain. When dots were programmed to move to the right, neurons in the brain that code for rightward movement would fire. As the subject watched for a longer period of time, the more often these neurons would fire. Eventually, a certain threshold would be reached, causing a flurry of activity in the brain. The subject would then respond that the dots were moving rightward.

Subjects were not consciously doing numerical calculations, but their subconscious was. When a threshold had been reached, a subject suddenly "realized" that the dots were moving rightward. While this particular study may be more about pattern recognition and spatial relationships than actual number manipulations, the same principle applies. People have calculators in their subconscious and they constantly use them — even math-challenged people.

Pouget says that this system of decision-making has several advantages. The most important of these is that it allows people to reach reasonable decisions in a short amount of time. If people were consciously counting the number of dots they saw moving in a certain direction and waiting until they saw 50 or 100 of them, it would take much longer.

The research also indicates that when people do reach a decision subconsciously, they also have an estimate of how certain they are about this decision. This varies for individual decisions and depends on where the triggering threshold has been set. Pouget is now investigating how the brain sets this threshold for different types of questions. Knowing that you're not going to hit the car in front of you requires a higher certainty than knowing that there's a sufficient supply of coffee in the pantry, at least for most people.

The actual experiments were performed by a team in the laboratory of Michael Shadlen, a professor of physiology and biophysics at the University of Washington. The results were published in the December 26, 2008 issue of Neuron.
January 26, 2009






 


 
Add Comment
NOTE: We regret that we cannot answer personal medical questions.

Name


Comment

Characters remaining:



Readers Comments
No comments have been made











This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.





The Doctor Will See You Now   |   LEGAL RESTRICTIONS AND TERMS OF USE OF THIS SITE. USE OF THIS SITE IS YOUR AGREEMENT TO THESE TERMS.
Copyright 2014 interMDnet Corporation. All rights reserved.
About Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | System Requirements